Table 1 demonstrates the descriptive results with reliability indices. Although several scales have significantly correlated, they all have weak associations. The model had acceptable fit (CFI = 0.941, TLI = 0.928, RMSEA = 0.043, [90% CI = 0.0380.048]). The strongest predictor of problematic Tinder use was self-esteem enhancement motivation (? = 0.37, p < .001).>
Dining table step 1.
The mediational model of personality traits, Tinder-use motivations and problematic Tinder use (Study 2). Note. All variables presented in ellipses are latent variables. For the sake of clarity, indicator variables related to latent variables and correlations between the variables were not depicted in this figure. One-headed arrows represent standardized regression weights. The non-significant pathways were not depicted on the figure for the sake of simplicity; *p < .05.>
Past knowledge claimed solid relationships ranging from reduced worry about-admiration and you can difficult on line behavior due to the fact profiles need to boost their self-esteem as the fresh digital ecosystem (elizabeth.grams., Armstrong ainsi que al., 2000; Yang & Tung, 2007). Continuer la lecture de « SEM are presented to look at the relationship patterns anywhere between personality traits and you may tricky Tinder use mediated by the Tinder-have fun with reasons »